Angela Grossmann
 

Looking Back, Looking Afresh: The Female Form Revisited


By Sharon Fuller


If the faces in the previous work of Angela Grossmann appeared to avoid the viewer’s gaze — either because in profile, or of the marginalised whose best attempt in the face of scrutiny is to look out with apprehension — this is certainly not so in her most recent work. Here they look back.

The figures — predominantly of young women — that made up Grossmann’s most recent body of work, Looking Back, do so unabashedly, and with a confidence not often encountered in contemporary renditions of the female form, especially where the figures are unclothed. With this new body of work, Vancouver-based, British-born Grossmann, too, looks back, exhibiting an assurance congruous with the figures she portrays as she looks afresh at the female body, pushing to uncover an invigorated female sexuality and inviting us to do likewise.

Grossmann, who came to Canada in the mid-1970s, recently returned to Vancouver, the city in which she found fame in 1985 as one of the eight Young Romantics, after living, working and studying in Paris, Amsterdam and Montreal. She now has her studio in Gastown, Vancouver's oldest site and teaches at the city's Emily Carr Institute of Art and Design, the institution from which she, as one of the Young Romantics, was launched on to the international stage along with Attila Richard Lukacs, (Ricky to his friends) Graham Gilmore, Derek Root, Vicky Marshall, Charles Rea, Philippe Raphanel and Mina Totino.

The young women depicted in Looking Back have come of age as Grossmann, at 46, has come of age, and as contemporary womanhood has come of age. All three now seem to recognise that the time for looking down, often with embarrassment, is gone. The self-effacing disposition has disappeared; the shying away is in the past; earlier anxieties have been banished. For Grossmann this stance of looking back may be new, but it has been in the making a long time, waiting to peer out since perhaps her art school days at Emily Carr in the early 1980s. She remembers producing a small piece about a decade ago of an unclothed woman that she then discounted as being not possible to do, putting it away, as she knew she was not yet prepared to go down that path. She never showed it to anyone, never sold it; “loving the work”, but not then entirely knowing what it meant, she felt that she, and others, were not yet ready for it. The time was not right then — sensibilities were guarded, curators cautious and depictions of the naked female form all too often controversial and frequently frowned upon.

Grossmann still has this work — and others in which she finds she followed a similar impulse to render women unashamed of being themselves, in whatever circumstances they find themselves, no matter what. She has only recently come to fully appreciate these works and what it is that she was attempting to do then with these renditions, and this appreciation she now finds in the context of her new body of work, Looking Back, recently exhibited at the Diane Farris Gallery in Vancouver, which represents her.Grossmann is now ready.

She is joyous about these new female forms which are her creations, as she is with the fact that she too can now look back, with new eyes, unafraid, as are the young women she has produced. This newly found confidence is one Grossmann shares with contemporary women. Indeed, there is something else at work beside her own creative subjectivity. She is keying into something larger — a phenomenon far bigger than Grossmann as lone woman artist working in the 21st century. Like the women rendered in the work, the contemporary woman has also found an unfamiliar assurance — looking back at the promiscuously desirous male gaze and the censorial stare alike, always unashamed, in whatever situation, and certainly on her own terms; facing the look, from whichever camp it comes.

Gallerist Diane Farris sees these new works of Grossmann’s as “women being comfortable with their bodies.” She says they represent “the end of political correctness about women painting women in the nude.” Audiences who came to the show — which ran at the Diane Farris Gallery through November, 2000 — indicated by their presence and notice that their conclusion was the same. The gallery was thronged with viewers, sales of the pieces significant and the collectors who bought them were made up of a diverse cross-section of collectors; men and women, couples, the younger and older.

Thus, the viewers of these works took up Grossmann’s invite, looking at the 17 bold figures and uncovering along with her an invigorated female sexuality that has been arrived at after almost a century of struggle, with a triumph that has increasingly come to include, rather than exclude, and one that talks to both women and men. This assured joyousness now evident in both the work and the artist translates into a working that comes quickly now that Grossmann has arrived in this previously unused place. This swiftness of work is part consequence of, firstly, almost two decades of art-making, secondly, at least a decade of living with and giving form to the long-held and cherished ideas with which she is now working, and finally of her newly acquired modest confidence.

Artists are often plagued with doubts, fears, anxieties. Is this an authentic rendering? Does it ring true? Does it work? But with these works, there was an immediate knowledge. Grossmann feels they are right – for themselves, for their time and for her.

This body of work was developed fairly rapidly over a period of about six months ahead of the November 2000 Vancouver opening. With these works Grossmann starts head-first. By carefully sifting through many, many, images she finds faces with the look — unabashed, assured, unashamed. Indeed, these faces have the opposite expressions to those in her previous body of work on criminals — where the faces did not appear to look back — and which she developed over a period from 1996 to 1999. In contrast, there the faces were shamed, bereft, isolated, with eyes that look out, and with much apprehension. With this current series, once she has found the image of the face she feels is true to her current vision, Grossmann then creates the body that is veracious to it, thus bringing these two aspects of femaleness together, joining the found head and the created body. She marries what she does — painting — with what the faces she has found are, or, in other words, she collaborates with her “photographic subjects”.

They are not just any face. There is always a conversation between her and those in the photograph. She draws on faces from another time, a previous time, using faces that are not current so as to warn her viewers not to take these images too literally, reminding them that it is within metaphor that she is working. These self-assured, self-confident women who stare back at us, which have only now become possible for Grossmann to create, are nevertheless still fantasy.

She has used old photographs before in previous bodies of work. In a 1992 artist's statement, Grossmann described this process as “using a mixture of their time and current techniques” to bring the faces into her time. “I re-interpret using collage, painting, drawing, cut/paste, revising their gender, social status, religion until they are unidentifiable, mysterious and unknowable. They still refer to the past although exactly when, where and who they are is no longer decipherable or even particularly important”.

In this series Grossmann joins together two ways of working. During her years as a student, and immediately following her graduation in 1985, the works were large, figurative and explosive. Some years later in Amsterdam, when she was pregnant with her son Sebastiaan and no longer able to work with large canvasses, Grossmann turned to working at a far smaller scale, often using found photographs, carefully selected, which she then made her own within the work she produced. She moved from the massive — climbing up on chairs to paint — to the miniature — with her face on the table. In this body of work the canvasses — mostly old tarpaulins, kitbags and torn-apart tents — are large; the carefully selected photographs are still there, but now they are joined to the expansive figures.

Between these two periods, Grossmann worked in Paris on a Canada Council Studio award, undertook and obtained an MFA at Concordia in 1991 and taught painting at Ottawa University from 1991 to 1993. Even though it has been over 16 years since she was a student at Emily Carr, she remains close to those who became known as Vancouver's Group of Five -- which include Lukacs, Gilmore, Root and Douglas Coupland and has works by all four are in her home which, located in downtown Vancouver, is within walking distance of Emily Carr. Coupland, who coined the term Generation X, was not part of the Young Romantics, but he was also at Emily Carr and a close friend during those years and, while his fame has largely been associated with writing rather than painting, he has returned to sculpture with a May exhibition at Monte Clark Gallery, the Vancouver gallery which also represents Gilmore and Root.

The five have collaborated on a print series, the proceeds of which will go into the 85-5 Visual Arts Foundation Scholarship, established last year to provide scholarships for students studying at their alma mater. As varied and international as her academic career has been are her exhibition locations, which have included Paris, London, Amsterdam, Cologne, Toronto, New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. With this new body of work, Grossmann is again looking out.
 
  • Press Release
  • Article: Looking Back







  • Back to Top